AN AI CODING AGENT.
WORK YOU CAN INSPECT.
The direction is practical: an independent desktop agent that can investigate a project and work through a bounded engineering task. The output should stand up to inspection.
- 01
OBSERVE
Read the request and the relevant working context.
- 02
REASON
Choose the smallest useful next action.
- 03
ACT
Use a configured tool to inspect or change the project.
- 04
VERIFY
Read the result before deciding what happens next.
ILLUSTRATIVE LOOP / AVAILABLE TOOLS DEPEND ON THE BUILD AND CONFIGURATION.
THE CONVERSATION
IS THE WORK LOG.
DO NOT CONFUSE
CONFIDENCE WITH PROOF.
A response can sound decisive and still miss the relevant file, the failing condition or the environment it will run in.
Set a boundary around the task. Ask for the evidence. Review the actual output of the tools, not only the summary that follows.
REVIEW PROTOCOLA coding agent needs a closed feedback loop
An agentic coding task contains decisions between tool calls. The relevant file may differ from the one first suggested, or command output may invalidate the initial explanation. Inspecting those results is what allows the next step to be grounded in the repository rather than in an assumption.
Set a narrow outcome and a clear review point. Ask the agent to report missing context and checks that could not run. The reference demonstrates a tool-based conversation, while the final capabilities of this product depend on its released build and configuration.